Director: M. Night Shyamalan Writer: M. Night Shyamalan Released: November 2000 Starring: Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson and Robin Wright Penn
—
Did anyone else not realise that Unbreakable is a prequel to Split?
As soon as we found out, we got our hands on the DVD since we loved Split so much.
You can tell it is an M. Night Shyamalan film immediately. The looooooong shots, the reflections in televisions and glass… The list goes on – it’s very Shyamalan-y.
Unbreakable is about David (Bruce Willis) who discovers he’s invincible. He’s essentially a superhero. So this is the story about him coming to terms with this, and discovering his arch enemy – something ever superhero must have.
Doctor: To answer your question, there are two reasons why I’m looking at you like this. One, because it seems in a few minutes you will officially be the only survivor of this train wreck, and two, because you didn’t break one bone. You don’t have a scratch on you.
The film is an arduous journey. It’s a long, slow arch that takes you on an epic journey, very… very… very… slowly…
I thought, because of this, Unbreakable must have have been made well before The Sixth Sense, as Unbreakable felt a little less complex, and it looked a bit ‘basic’.
Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson): Do you know what the scariest thing is? To not know your place in this world, to not know why you’re here. That’s – that’s just an awful feeling.
The casting for The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable are very similar – I can only assume Hayley Joel Osment was not available, because Shyamalan found his doppelgänger, Spencer Treat Clark.
Just like every other Shyamalan film, he makes an appearance – keep an eye out for him!
If you’re a comic book fan, you’ll probably enjoy the nuances of the comic-inspired characters, and will be happy to endure the long pauses and dialogue-heavy scenes.
Elijah Price: It’s alright to be afraid, David, because this part won’t be like a comic book. Real life doesn’t fit into little boxes that were drawn for it.
It was good, but not great. I like Bruce Willis, and I like Shyamalan films, but this wasn’t their best work. (The Village is still my favourite film by this director.)
Nevertheless, it’s an interesting backstory to Split. It fills the holes in a bit.
Director: Lone Scherfig Writer: Based on Their Finest Hour and a Half by Lissa Evens. Screenplay by Gaby Chiappe Released: April 2017 Starring: Gemma Arterton, Sam Claflin, Bill Nighy, Jack Huston, Helen McCrory, Eddie Marsan, Jake Lacy, Rachael Stirling and Richard E. Grant
—
Well. That was a pretty enormous disappointment.
After seeing the trailer, I thought, ‘this is my kind of film’. During 1940, a female protagonist, Catrin (Emma Arterton) proves herself to be a talented screenwriter for propaganda films (created to inform, and to lift the spirits of the public). Bill Nighy – a fabulous actor – plays an egotistical has-been actor called Ambrose, and everyone looks beautiful.
‘Brilliant’, I thought, ‘a coming-of-age drama based around film and writing – both things I love – with a sprinkle of comedy and a touch of tragedy against a wartime backdrop.’
How wrong I was.
The first part is entertaining enough, Catrin is living with her husband who is basically a failed artist and not earning much money. She lands this great writing job where she writes the ‘slop’, or female dialogue.
Tom Buckley (Sam Clafin):Don’t confuse facts with truth… Film is real life with the boring bits cut out.
She soon becomes more successful in a male-dominated world, and warms to a fellow writer. Among this, everyone is dodging London bombings. At the end of every raid, someone else she knows has died.
The story carries the standard structure of any drama. But unfortunately my suspension of disbelief is totally destroyed during the ‘absolute low’. Without giving too much away, after a particularly devastating bombing, the protagonist loses everything.
Afterwards, the story is supposed to take a turn for the better, with a happy ending. However, the protagonist doesn’t ‘win’ at the end, and the story falls off a cliff. I’ve seem this film described as a ‘bittersweet, uplifting romance-drama’. It’s not. It’s an unnecessarily devastating war film.
I was disappointed to say the least. Why tear our hero down so far? Where’s the inspiration in that? This was supposed to be a story about an underdog who succeeded despite the war, despite being a woman in a man’s world, despite being downtrodden and disrespected. (Her lack of ability to stand up for herself is frustrating to say the least.)
In fact, it’s a story about an underdog who, with a lot of hard work, succeeds professionally and personally despite everything – until the rug is pulled from under her and she ends up worse-off than ever. Who the hell wants to watch a film like that? It just made me feel bad.
I enjoyed how the story was about a writer, who in some scenes is shown to be rewriting how her day turned out, or rewriting a conversation she had where she wished she said something differently (something I sometimes do!). I also liked the exploration into why people love films.
Tom Buckley:Why do people like films? It’s because stories are structured. They have a shape, a purpose, a meaning; and when things go bad they’re still a part of a plan; there’s still a point to them. Unlike life.
I like how she had professional success and that she was proud of herself, but overall, I walked away with the message ‘give it a go despite the odds. Try really hard. But you’ll fail and end up with no one and nothing anyway’.
Director: John Lee Hancock Writer: Robert D. Siegel Released: January 2017 Starring: Michael Keaton, Nick Offerman, John Carroll Lynch, Linda Cardellini, Patrick Wilson, B. J. Novak and Laura Dern
—
I’m sure there’s a documentary or two out there about the history of McDonald’s. But if you’d rather watch a snappy film about it, choose The Founder.
It’s an account of Ray Kroc’s (Michael Keaton) greed, and the sadness and destruction he left in his wake.
I knew Ray Kroc was a bit of a wheeling-dealing businessman, but I didn’t realise what an underhanded tyrant he was until I watched this film. He completely swindled the actual founders of McDonald’s – brothers, Mac and Dick McDonald (John Caroll Lynch and Nick Offerman) – out of the success and profit of the company.
RayKroc: If I saw a competitor drowning, I’d shove a hose in his throat
He not only hijacked the business, he took every shortcut available to him. For example, real milkshakes made from real ice cream, became powdered milk, emulsifiers and flavourings in order to cut costs and increase production. The personal touch that the McDonald’s brothers gave to the business, was tarnished.
DickMcDonald: If phony powdered milkshakes is your idea of progress, you have a profound misunderstanding of what McDonald’s is about.
I don’t know if it was my imagination, but the film began with bright lighting and sunny skies. But as Ray Kroc got his hands into the business, I swear the overall lighting got dimmer. Which I liked, because it reflected the amount of stress he inflicted on the brothers.
I’m not surprised McDonald’s has become the controversial empire that it has become today, when you see how the humble, family business was manipulated by Kroc.
Michael Keaton did a terrific job. He portrayed the manic and flippant, money-hungry man that is Ray Kroc very well indeed. Money came before family, ethics and genuine products.
RayKroc: You know what – contracts are like hearts, they are made to be broken.
It’s sad tale, really, because although McDonald’s is undoubtedly a successful brand, it’s not without blood on its hands. I can see how that came to be the case now, as the foundations of this business is a greedy one. But, as stated on the front of the DVD cover: ‘you can’t start a fast food empire without getting a little greedy’.
It’s an upsetting film because I unfortunately know that these people walk among us. The kind of business person who does anything possible to make money at any cost. But, maybe that really is the attitude you need to have to become successful… I hope that isn’t true.
RayKroc: …persistence. Nothing in this world can take the place of good old persistence. Talent won’t. Nothing’s more common than an unsuccessful man with talent.
As I said, it’s possibly a more entertaining way to learn about how the Gold Arches started out. But it does leave you with a bitter taste in your mouth.
Circling back to the film itself, it does lack a climax and is a bit of a flat film in some parts. But overall, worth a watch for the educational enlightenment.
But don’t expect to feel okay with the world afterwards. Especially during the credits when they show clips of the real Ray Kroc.
Director: Edgar Wright Writer: Edgar Wright Released: June 2017 Starring: Jamie Foxx, Kevin Spacey, Ansel Elgort, Lily James and Jon Hamm
—
From the genius that is Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz,The World’s End and Scott Pilgrim vs the World), comes Baby Driver. A music-infused movie about a getaway driver named Baby, played by baby-faced actor Ansel Elgort (The Fault in our Stars).
Baby scores his own life by picking the appropriate music on his iPod for everything he does. He doesn’t do anything without music playing in his ears, stemming from a traumatic car crash as a child that left him with tinnitus.
Doc (Kevin Spacey): “Still got a hum in the drum, he plays his iPod to drown it out”
I’m thinking this might be converted into an all-singing, all-dancing musical or stage play one day.
In some ways, it’s a ‘runaway film‘. But this theme in the movie is soon hijacked by reality, how you can’t run forever and how you must face the music at some point. This realism is something I like about the film.
Whereas I usually fall asleep during action films, such as in various James Bond scenes, I didn’t in Baby Driver. I think because it was mixed with comedy a lot of the time, and it appears to be a tad more realistic, because the protagonists actually get hit in gun fights.
Bats (Jamie Foxx): “The moment you catch feelings is the moment you catch a bullet.”
I have studied Wright’s films ever since I started studying media at high school. Baby Driver exhibits classic Wright hallmarks, including extremely layered shots where you’ll pick something new up on every watch. There is nothing in this movie that is there by accident. Their costume, the music; everything is there for a reason.
My favourite Wright hallmark is the very long scene without a single edit, all perfectly choreographed, just like in Shaun of the Deadwhen Simon Pegg’s character walks to the corner shop and back.
Another one, is the compilation of short, sharp edits. Finally, Wright’s English humour running through the dialogue, making Baby Driver stand out from the more glossy Hollywood action films.
Baby (Ansel Elgort): Your tattoo says ‘hat’? JD: Yeah, it used to say ‘hate’. But to increase my chances of employment I had the E removed. Baby: How’s that working out for you? JD: Who doesn’t like hats?
While I thoroughly enjoyed the first third of the film, it went a bit long and flabby in the middle. Toward the end it picks up again, until the very end, which seems rushed, causing my suspension of disbelief to be stretched.
JD: I left my shotgun behind. Bats: Not groovy JD. Not groovy at all.
While this isn’t a favourite film of mine, it is certainly a one-in-a-million film, and a good date night movie. The characters are cool and are played by talented actors, with a love story and a ton of wicked car chases and gun fights.
Griff: Is [Baby] retarded? Doc: Retarded means slow. Was he slow? Griff: No.
Director: M. Night Shyamalan Writer: M. Night Shyamalan Released: January 2017 Starring: James McAvoy and Betty Buckley
—
Another brilliant film from M. Night Shyamalan. It’s the best kind of story – the kind that you’ll be thinking about for days.
For me, Split is a return to Shyamalan’s trademark of well-rounded characters and fantastic storylines. It’s a film that echoes the genius of The Village and The Sixth Sense.
Split is about a man called Kevin Wendell-Crumb (James McAvoy, whose talent will be gushed upon shortly) who has 23 personalities. He kidnaps three girls and keeps them hostage. All the while, one of the three girls cottons on to his multiple personalities, and tries to manipulate one of them – a nine-year-old boy – to help them escape. But, will they be able to escape before the mysterious 24th personality reveals itself?
I can’t explain how remarkable McAvoy is in this film. I know McAvoy as Mr Tumnus from the Narnia films, we named our goat Mr Tumnus after his portrayal of this character because we loved him so much.
Every one of McAvoy’s personalities in this film is so believable, especially Patricia. Oh my goodness, she’s scary. The crazy thing is, you feel relieved when you realise McAvoy’s character is the nine-year-old, and petrified when he’s Patricia, even though he’s physically the same person. That’s how talented he is. He can morph himself into different people seemlessly.
I didn’t think much of the hostages’ acting. They were mostly appearing dumb-founded with a lot of silent, wide-eyed staring. But I was fascinated by the psychiatrist in the film, Dr Karen Fletcher (Betty Buckley). Buckley’s acting was phenomenal. I was hooked on every word she said; she was so articulate and fascinating. So actually, perhaps I should say kudos to the screen writing. Nevertheless, along with McAvoy, she was great.
I was expecting a horror, but this is actually a thriller. More than that, it is a sequel to the thriller Unbreakable (featuring Bruce Willis), and a prequel to a thriller called Glass, which is set to be released next year! I’m on that like white on rice.
I thoroughly enjoyed this film. If you loved Shyamalan’s films from the early days, then you’ll love this too. Brilliant writing, fantastic casting, and horrifyingly complex characters and theories that will have you dwelling on the film for days.
Director: Stephen Daldry Writer: Screenplay by David Hare, based on Der Vorleser by Bernhard Schlink Released: 2008 Starring: Kate Winslet, Ralph Fiennes, David Kross, Lena Olin and Bruno Ganz
—
I’ve been thinking about this movie for days.
A gripping tale in post-war Germany, about a woman name Hanna Schmitz (Kate Winslet) who has a summer affair with a teenage boy named Michael Berg (David Kross). Their romance centres around the novels Berg is reading at school, which Schmitz asks him to read aloud to her everyday. Their passionate relationship soon ends when Schmitz mysteriously disappears, heartbroken Berg is hugely impacted by the relationship and its abrupt end.
A few years later, Berg is a law student and is sitting in on a Nazi war crime trial in court where he is stunned to see Schmitz. She is accused of being wholly responsible for mass murder during the war, but Berg knows a certain bit of information that could reduce her sentence significantly. Should he reveal it to the courts to save a former lover? Or does she not deserve his help?
The Reader is about the guilt innocent people feel for the bad things loved ones have done. The guilt of loving someone who is guilty of major crimes. The betrayal and shame felt of a loved one’s poor decisions.
Professor Rohl (Michael Berg’s law professor): Societies think they operate by something called morality, but they don’t. They operate by something called law. 8000 people worked at Auschwitz. Precisely 19 have been convicted, and only 6 of murder. The question is never “Was it wrong”, but “Was it legal”. And not by our laws, no. By the laws at the time.
This was inspired by the writer’s experience of post-war Germany where his beloved and respected professors revealed the text books they had written during Hitler’s reign, and how he felt betrayed by the people he thought were perfect.
The first half of the film made me feel uncomfortable because the love affair is between a woman who is twice the age of the boy. The nudity and intimate scenes is typical of European movies – who find no shame in the human body, or with sex. Whereas, English and American films are far less comfortable with nudity and increasingly at ease with violence, blood and gore. A strange cultural divide that’s influenced their films.
The second half of the film, however, is absolutely gripping. The war-crime trial in the courtroom, and the tangible tension between the main characters; the emotional extremes of innocence and guilt, love and regret. There is such a build-up to this point that I really felt I was looking through the eyes of Michael Berg.
The writers did an amazing job of never telling the audience how to feel. Because it’s based in post-Nazi Germany, they intended the story to steer clear of blame, justice and forgiveness in respect for the survivors and victims.
Michael Berg doesn’t have a monologue, but you can feel the responsibility and guilt easily; the guilt is so easily transferred to the audience. This makes you feel uncomfortable, because of the guilt you feel for feeling sorry for Hanna.
The whole time I was in Berg’s head, trying to figure out what the right thing to do was: ‘I surely shouldn’t feel sorry for a murderer… But I’ve only known her as a lover this entire time. I also know she’s being unfairly charged… But why should I care? She’s a murderer. But I’m a law student and fair justice comes first…’ As I said, it is a heavy film that stayed with me for days.
The film follows Michael Berg right the way through to when he’s middle-aged (Ralph Fiennes), showing how guilt and secrets have affected him later on in life.
The Reader will leave you with more questions than answers, which was the intention. You’re toying with your emotions just as much as Michael Berg is – what’s right and wrong, what punishment guilty people deserve and what they don’t, and when the truth should and shouldn’t be told.
Michael Berg: I have a piece of information, concerning one of the defendants. Something they do not admitting.
Professor Rohl: What information? You don’t need to tell me. It’s perfectly clear you have a moral obligation to disclose it to the court.
Michael: It happens this information is favourable to the defendant. It can help her case. It may even affect the outcome, certainly the sentencing.
Professor Rohl: So? …what we feel isn’t important. It’s utterly unimportant. The only question is what we do. If people like you don’t learn from what happened to people like me, then what the hell is the point of anything?
A fascinating watch. My wish is only that it wasn’t a romance/drama, and that is was a courtroom drama like A Few Good Men. It would have a totally different movie of course, but it was the courtroom scenes that were the most compelling.
Directed: Denis Villeneuve Writer: Hampton Fancher Released: October 2017 Starring: Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin Wright, Mackenzie Davis, Carla Juri, Lennie James, Dave Bautista and Jared Leto
—
The story: Based in the year 2049, replicants (bioengineered humans) are servants and slaves in society. K (Ryan Gosling) is a replicant who works as a “Blade Runner”—an officer who hunts down and “retires” (kills) rogue replicants. However, he discovers the corpse of a female replicant who died during an emergency caesarean section.
This scares the authorities because reproduction of replicant was previously thought impossible. Fearful that this new discovery could result in a war between humans and replicants, K is ordered to find and kill the child.
Well, thank Christ we went to see this movie in the ‘Gold Class’ luxury cinema, because the recliner seats made for a comfortable place to sleep.
This snail-paced sequel highlights the reason why sequels to blockbuster originals should not be done.
Admittedly, I haven’t seen the first Blade Runner film from start to finish in one sitting, but I’ve seen basically all of it if you puzzle together all of my attempts. It is a good film – a fantastic film in fact – according to many. And I am happy to agree with this opinion. It certainly was a film before its time in many ways.
Nevertheless, Blade Runner 2049 was slow both in terms of the film’s pacing (made worse by its almost 3-hour duration), and the characters’ slow movements (a bit of a let-down for an action film). It was also a bit weird. Nevertheless, the casting saved it, particularly with Harrison Ford’s great return.
Rick Deckard (Ford): I had your job once. I was good at it.
‘K’ (Gosling): Things were simpler then.
Ryan Gosling and his chiseled jawline. Harrison Ford and his smokey voice. Robin Wright and her ‘don’t care ’bout nothin’, Son’ attitude. Carla Juri and her remarkable expressions (who features in my favourite Sharon Van Etten music video). The talent here saved the film, for sure.
For those of you who haven’t seen the first Blade Runner, I think you’d be more inclined to enjoy it. So long as you enjoy the sci-fi action genre. However, because I knew the tone of the first film, I was expecting it to be vastly similar but updated for the modern audience. Which, I think they certainly tried to do.
Alas, it wasn’t terrible. But certainly hasn’t cast a shadow on the original.
Directed: Joe Wright Written: Anothony McCarten Released: January 2018 Starring: Gary Oldman Kristin Scott Thomas Lily James Stephen Dillane Ronald Pickup Ben Mendelsohn
—
If you thought Dunkirk and The King’s Speech were epics, wait until you see Darkest Hour. It’s another perspective of the remarkable rescue of British soldiers from the shores of Dunkirk, this time the story is told from inside British parliament.
With the Germans closing in, the battle appears to be lost. But Britain’s new prime minister Winston Churchill is not ready to give up. While his cabinet threatens resignation unless he agrees to peace talks with Hitler, Churchill becomes desperate to find a way to save the men on the front lines, and prevent invasion.
With merely hours to go until the Germans get through Dunkirk, Churchill has the weight of the nation on his shoulders as he figures out a way stop them on his own. But time is ticking!
Winston Churchill is played by Gary Oldman, whom I had seen in a lot of films without even realising it (Harry Potter, Batman, A Christmas Carol…). What a guy. The prosthetics are flawless, and his impersonation of how we’ve come to know Churchill was brilliant. You would think they had brought him back from the dead for the film!
Churchill’s speeches and his word-wizardry is legendary, and this film certainly takes advantage of this. It is dialogue-heavy, but I think that’s where the magic is, so make sure you hold your attention. There are some hard-hitting one-liners in this movie, powered by the shear emotion and strength.
Will you stop interrupting me while I am interrupting you! – Churchill
It is almost unbelievable how Winston Churchill saved not only the UK, but Europe from Hitler’s reign. He did it without the support of his cabinet, although, the British public were behind him as shown in a fantastic scene depicting Churchill’s first ride on the underground.
He speaks frankly with the public in his carriage; not speaking down to them and not sugar-coating anything. I got chills from the unity of the people, as they all proclaimed that they would stand up to Hitler and not reason with him in peace talks. As Churchill said:
You can not reason with a Tiger when your head is in its mouth! – Churchill
I don’t know how it must have felt having such a decision to make, but this movie certainly projected the stress and weight of the situation well.
A brilliant film with fantastic cast members, lighting and suspense. Akin to a courtroom drama, I suppose, but ultimately a fantastic alternative to watching a documentary on the events.
Definitely worth a watch, but I think the second watch would be better because there’s so much information to absorb.
Directed: Christopher Nolan Written: Christopher Nolan Released: July 2017 Starring: Fionn Whitehead, Tom Glynn-Carney, Jack Lowden, Harry Styles, Aneurin Barnard, James D’Arcy, Barry Keoghan, Kenneth Branagh, Cillian Murphy, Mark Rylance and Tom Hardy
—
I don’t know where to start – I’m about to word-vomit on the page! There’s so much to say, so I’ve broken it up with little titles so that you don’t get too overwhelmed…
Well firstly, I’ll set the scene: I went to see this film with my significant-other in the town of Wareham, Dorset. We went to the REX Cinema, which is an independent cinema that was built in 1889. The small hall was packed when we went – I even had to book tickets two weeks in advance! The showing attracted many locals, likely due to the local film locations such as Swanage railway station and Weymouth.
Dunkirk is definitely the best war-based film I have seen since Saving Private Ryan.
Before I continue, I must mention that ‘yes’, this film is based during the war – as are plenty of films. But this one is different. It’s not full of blood and gore – it feels more like an emotional documentation of a snapshot in time. A remarkable story indeed.
This is an incredibly moving and haunting survival film about British soldiers desperately trying to escape the ever-approaching Nazi German forces. They’re attacking by air and land. The British soldiers attempt to evacuate France at Dunkirk to England via ship, despite all odds.
How the story is told:
The film is told by intertwining three stories, which transports you back in time by putting you in the shoes of various characters:
Land “You can practically see it from here… Home.”
Soldiers evacuating the beach. This story is told within a time frame of one week through the eyes of Tommy* (Fionn Whitehead). The sky is dark and the sea is just as unwelcoming as the freezing cold beach they’re stranded on. With enemy planes flying over-head, the foot-soldiers must have felt insignificant and vulnerable as the British await for an overcrowded ship to take them home. * Named after the slang term for a common British Army Solider.
Sea “Men my age dictate this war. Why should we be allowed to send our children to fight it?”
Brave, unarmed civilians journeying from Dorset into the rough channel on their wooden boats. They try to save as many men as they can from overturned Navy ships that are bleeding oil into already blackened seas, with men fighting to escape the ruins in a blind panic. This story is told within the time frame of 24 hours from the point of view of Mr. Dawson (Sir Mark Rylance) and his son Peter (Tom Glynn-Carney).
Air “Why [would the Germans] waste precious tanks when they can pick us off from the air like a fish in a barrel?”
Royal Air Force pilots flying planes over the English channel, protecting the ships and boats carrying soldiers from Dunkirk as they aim for England’s shore. The Spitfires scream overhead, not immediately knowing if they’re British or German… The feeling of claustrophobia from being strapped inside a plane without fuel, or being stuck in the cockpit of a sinking plane… It creates an atmosphere thick with anxiety that can be felt all the way to the cinema chair. This section of the film is told in a time frame of one hour from the point-of-view of RAF pilot, Farrier (Tom Hardy).
These intertwining stories of various time windows was genius. Just enough time to understand each character and what they were risking, but not so dragged-out that it becomes a Peter Jackson marathon movie.
I really felt like I got a glimpse into how the soldiers, pilots and civilians felt in that moment in time.
Audio:
The first thing that struck me was the audio (this movie is a cinematic essential – don’t wait for the DVD! Buy a ticket! You need the surround-sound). The sound of ships creaking, the sound of the Spitfires over-head, the sound of distant gunfire. All of which clearly inspired the Hans Zimmer soundtrack. The audio of this film is an art within itself. Incredible.
Commander Bolton: “The tide’s turning now.”
Captain Winnant: “How can you tell?”
Commander Bolton: “The bodies are coming back.”
Casting:
I didn’t recognise many of the actors apart from half of the Inceptionand Batmancast, of course (Michael Cain’s voiceover, Tom Hardy and Cillian Murphy).
But the actors were all fascinating to look at – they have interesting faces (particularly Barry Keoghan’s character, George) that makes you want to study and stare at them.
Of course, there is Harry Styles – Nolan reckons he didn’t have the faintest Scooby-Doo about the level of Styles’ fame before casting him. Poppycock if you ask me. Nevertheless, he doesn’t exactly steal the show, and he doesn’t look too out of place either.
Conclusion:
This is a once in a lifetime film. It’ll make you jump, it’ll make you cry, it’ll send chills down your spine, but most importantly it makes you think about what could have been.
Blind Man: “Well done lads. Well done.”
Alex: “All we did is survive.”
Blind Man: “That’s enough.”
I got so choked up at that line. “That’s enough.” I was gone, and so was my mascara.
After the Dunkirk screening at REX cinema, the audience (predominately Baby Boomers) were vocal post-showing as they discussed their stories amongst themselves. One gentleman even slapped my fiancé on the back and said: “it would have been youshould the war have happened today!” Chilling. Particularly because we walked out on to the old, narrow streets of Wareham, which made me feel like I was still being transported back to war-time Dorset.
The next day I took out a book called ‘World War II for beginners’ and a book called ‘Frontline Dorset’ to educate myself more on this unfathomable time.
Director: Clint Eastwood Writers: Paul Haggis (Based on F.X. Toole’s story) Released: December, 2004 Starring: Clint Eastwood Hilary Swank Morgan Freeman
—
I have heard references to this movie within multiple movies (Pitch Perfect in particular), but had never bothered watching it. From the outside, I figured it’s just a violent, shallow and dark tale of a female boxer. So I never showed much interest before I was leant the movie, so I thought I should give it a go.
Nevertheless, after watching Million Dollar Baby, I realised that my assumption was correct. It is certainly dark and violent.
However, the story is far more engaging and more emotionally satisfying than I thought it would be. I had assumed it would be like a Bourne action film, but instead of the endless bullets and guns and shooting, it would endless hits, punches and toothless, bloody grins. Thankfully this film held more substance though.
I should have known that if Morgan Freeman and Clint Eastwood are in it, then it would be a decent film.
Despite Maggie’s (Hilary Swank) jarring Southern accent, I enjoyed watching a female protagonist being as successful as a typical male protagonist would be. It was also refreshing to see a strong woman retain her femininity within the male-dominated sport of boxing.
It was gruesome at times, particularly the part where Maggie gets her nose broken. (Very realistic though.) Then it’s deeply philosophical at other times. It’s a great underdog movie.
That is until the ending…
Her final round was hard-hitting (no pun intended). It only took one second for a dirty swing from a dodgy competitor to result in such permanent damage. I found this scene quite moving actually; how in a split second, a decision can massively change a person’s fate.
Disappointingly, the conclusion is far from what I hoped. Was it really necessary to build our main character up that high, only to let her fall so devastatingly? Bit grim. Bit depressing.
Directed: Tate Taylor Written: Erin Cressida Wilson. Based on The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins Released: October 2016 Starring: Emily Blunt, Rebecca Ferguson, Justin Theroux, Haley Bennett, Luke Evans, Allison Janney (Juno’s mum!), Édgar Ramírez and Lisa Kudrow.
—
The Girl on the Train is up there with Gone Girl! A mind-twisting psychological thriller, through the eyes of Rachel (Emily Blunt) – a frail alcoholic who is the last person to see Megan Hipwell (Haley Bennett) alive.
However, as we see the events unfold from Rachel’s point of view, you never know what is real and what has been imagined, as she struggles to remember what she saw .
Is she the murderer? Was it the ginger dude on the train? Was it Megan’s husband? You honestly wouldn’t know for sure – massive twists!
We experience the battle against herself as she grows stronger and more focussed on trying to remember what she saw that night when Megan went missing.
I have read the book, and if I had of seen the movie immediately after I think I would have agreed with the public’s negative reaction of it being too different to the novel. As instead of it being set in the dingy outer suburbs of London, it is set in glamourous waterside mansions of New York.
Apparently the movie was always going to be set somewhere in the USA, because alcoholism is ‘less accepted there‘, and the juxtaposition of the character’s sadness with the glorious mansions she passed on the train made it visually shocking… I still don’t think it was necessary to change the country’s setting, but whatever. At least Emily Blunt was allowed to remain English.
I enjoyed it very much, though. The characters are believable and relatable (my two big ticks for every movie). Emily Blunt makes an amazing drunk person – that must have taken a lot of practice to look that authentic. It’s actually scary and makes you think twice about drinking.
I’m pleased they didn’t make her look flawless while she was drunk. I was worried they would make her look too ‘pretty’, but her cheeks are puffy and red, her eye make-up is smudged and her hair is messy – you wouldn’t know she’s a celebrity.
But if I had to be nit-picky, the male characters all looked far too similar. I guess this was to encourage you to see through the hazy eyes of a drunkard who couldn’t identify anyone. But with the film being visually dark, everyone having short, dark hair could get confusing if you didn’t know the storyline.
Or maybe it’s just our crappy TV that makes the contrast too deep.
Nevertheless, if you haven’t read the book you’ll likely enjoy it more, because you wouldn’t be able to notice the differences from the novel. But you may find it a bit slow-paced and long-winded at times.
Would recommend!
Jodie’s rating: 8/10
PS. On more than one occasion, I have been told that if I didn’t have crooked teeth, chubby cheeks or many of my current facial features, that I would look JUST like Emily! 🤪🤪 *so proud*.
Director: Taika Waititi
Writer: Taika Waititi (screenplay), Barry Crump (author of “Wild Pork and Watercress”) and Te Arepa Kahi
Released: 2016
Starring: Sam Neill, Julian Dennison, Rachel House, Rima Te Wiata, Stan Walker, Oscar Knightly, Rhys Darby…
—
I really needed this film in my life.
Another Kiwi classic from director Taika Waititi, Hunt for the Wilderpeople is about a national manhunt ordered for a rebellious Kiwi kid, Ricky (Julian Dennison), and his foster uncle, Hec (Sam Neill), who go missing in the wild New Zealand bush.
[Reading wanted poster]: “‘Faulkner (Sam Neill) is cauc-asian’… Well, they got that wrong because you’re obviously white.” – Ricky Baker
A fantastically hilarious and beautiful tribute to everything that is Kiwi.
After moving back to the UK, I didn’t realise how much I missed New Zealand until I bought the DVD of Hunt for the Wilderpeople. I also didn’t realise how much I identify with the Kiwi ways of life before finishing this movie.
For I can relate to the Kiwiana culture that courses through this movie, the humour, the landscape, the accent – once a cause for embarrassment to me, is now a twang that makes me feel overwhelmingly nostalgic and patriotic. I have concluded that the only English thing about me left is my crooked teeth.
I finished watching this movie with mascara running down my face (mostly due to nostalgic tears of joy and laughter) and an empty packet of Whittaker’s chocolate in my hand, while my feet were cosy in my New Zealand sheepskin slippers (you wouldn’t know it’s currently summer in the UK).
The main character, 12-year-old Julian Dennison, was absolutely phenomenal. He needn’t say much at all – his facial expressions are enough.
But I must say, Paula (Rachel House) has to be my favourite character. She made me laugh so hard! She’s absolutely hilarious. It’s not always what she says, it’s how she says it. Golden!
“Well, I see he has a rifle. Just keep it away from this little guy. God knows what he’s capable of. OK, he’s all yours. No returns.” – Paula, child welfare
Of course, it wouldn’t be a New Zealand film if it didn’t have Rhys Darby in it! He makes an appearance as “PSYCHO SAM”.
A perfect film for homesick Kiwis. Loved it. I’m about to watch it for a fourth time this week.
Director: Clint Eastwood
Writer: Todd Komarnicki
Released: September 2016
Starring: Tom Hanks, Aaron Eckhart and Laura Linney
—
If this film was a human, it would be:
A white American male holding the US flag in one hand with a hamburger in the other, a bald eagle perched on his shoulder, while sitting on a mustang, wearing a cowboy hat and a shirt that reads ‘God bless America’, with keys in his back pocket to his Chevrolet and his white-picket-fenced suburban home in the distance… This movie was an all-American film indeed.
Based of course on the spectacular events of January 2009 where Chesley Sullenberger (Sully) landed a commercial plane on the Hudson river after an birdstrike took out both the plane’s engines. All 155 souls onboard survived.
What Sully: Miracle on the Hudson focusses on is the aftermath where our hero is interrogated as questions over whether both engines really did stop working arise, and whether or not Sully really did make the safest decision to make a water landing.
The reenactments of the plane crash were remarkable, and Tom Hanks did a marvellous job of portraying the self-doubt and desperation his character experienced as he tried to keep his reputation as a pilot and safety expert intact. But of course Tom Hanks did an incredible job; he’s Tom Hanks.
The actors playing the parts of the passengers, I reluctantly say, were particularly poor at acting. Over-acting made them extremely unbelievable.
Imagine if this incident happened in the UK – I would love to see that movie. Because Great Britain doesn’t hail heroes, we hail underdogs. As Ricky Gervais once said, that’s the difference between the English and the Americans – we love a good underdog story because we focus on the negative, whereas they focus on the positive. ‘Anyone can be the next president’ versus ‘it would never happen to you’ kind of attitude, which feeds into our society and films. As my media studies teach once said, films are the mirrors held up to society.
Our Sully movie would be down-to-Earth (no pun intended) and probably a lot of depressing. Which, strangely I would probably relate to more. Therefore, I enjoyed Sully, but it was a bit difficult to relate to as it was a tad ‘happy-clappy’ and a bit too intensely positive.
I wouldn’t say it’s an inspirational epic, but it was an enjoyable story.
Director: Theodore Melfi Writers: Allison Schroeder & Theodore Melfi. Based on the bookby Margot Lee Shetterly Released: December 2016 Starring: Taraji P. Henson, Octavia Spencer, Janelle Monáe, Kevin Costner, Kirsten Dunst Jim Parsons, Mahershala Ali, Aldis Hodge and Glen Powell
—
This was actually quite a funny film!
I was expecting a super dramatic biopic, but as compelling as the storyline absolutely is, it is intertwined with down-to-Earth humour. (Pun intended.)
A fantastically inspiring movie based on three real-life black women who worked at NASA in the sixties. It follows their triumphs and successes, despite being completely discriminated against for being black, and for being women.
A classic ‘human’ story, with particularly relatable and believable moments that are so easy to connect with emotionally.
Karl Zielinski: …Let me ask you, if you were a white male, would you wish to be an engineer? Mary Jackson: I wouldn’t have to. I’d already be one.
Truly inspiring, shocking and sassy!
The three main characters are Katherine Goble Johnson (Taraji Penda Henson, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button), Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer, The Help) and Mary Jackson (Janelle Monáe).
Mary Jackson was my personal favourite because she had some of the best come-backs, and every dress she wore was absolutely beautiful. I want all of them please. (Look at everyone’s shoes too! I’m in love.)
The film is perhaps longer than needed… But having said that, there’s not a single scene I would be happy parting with!
Vivian Mitchell (Kirstin Dunst): Despite what you may think, I have nothing against y’all. Dorothy Vaughan: I know, I know you probably believe that.
I thoroughly enjoyed it, and so did my fiancé. We laughed a lot, I cried a lot (the proposal seen oh my Loooooord!!) and we walked away at the end of a mighty fine evening feeling uplifted.
We went to see Hidden Figures at a cinema in Wareham, Dorset called The Rex Cinema. I would thoroughly recommend paying a visit. The cinema was built in the 1800s, and the same grand and intriguing interior remains today. It was the perfect atmosphere to watch such a historical and proud film.
Director: Jocelyn Moorhouse Writer: Screenplay by Jocelyn Moorhouse & P.J Hogan. Based on the book by Rosalie Ham. Released: September 2015 Starring: Kate Winslet, Judy Davis, Liam Hemsworth and Hugo Weaving
—
What I thought was going to be a quirky, enchanting, and uplifting story, turned out to be a dark and twisted tale.
Despite Kate Winslet’s beauty and surprisingly accurate Australian accent, this story was far from a sweet and innocent drama. TheDressmaker is about a woman returning home from Europe to the rural Australian village she grew up in. She endeavors to discover the secrets of her childhood.
Who knew that the secrets would be so tragic and dark. I watched TheDressmaker while home alone, and I couldn’t get to sleep for hours afterward. The violence, black humour and horrifically tragic deaths that occurred scarred me!
Probably because I was expecting a light-weight drama, and didn’t foresee the horrors that unfolded. But it was still a tad sadistic, and I felt a little ripped-off because nothing good happens to the supposedly ‘cursed’ main character, Tilly (Winslet).
I am a fan of Kate Winslet, but the unfortunate surprises and twists in this movie were not pleasant. But then again, I’m not a fan of dark humour. Especially when the DVD cover in no way hints at the horror that unfolds. Good grief.
It’s not a poor movie, but it certainly wasn’t for me. So, I would say, watch The Dressmaker by all means! But be warned that this is not a rom/com/drama. It’s more of a horror/thriller/creepy kind of movie… You’ll never want to trust anyone again after seeing what the creepy villagers in the movie get up to.
Director: Damien Chazelle Writer: Damien Chazelle Released: December 2016 Starring: Emma Stone, Ryan Gosling, John Legend and J.K Simmons
—
IT’S SO MAGICAL!
Despite the trailer making me expect Glee meets Grease, I had heard so many rave reviews about La La Land, that I simply had to see it for myself.
I was not disappointed.
A story about a boy and a girl, with grand dreams (already a refreshing storyline in itself). Ryan Gosling’s character, Sebastian, wants to be a jazz musician playing in his own bar – he represents old-style Hollywood. Emma Stone’s character, Mia, wants to be a successful actress – she represents the Prius-driving new-age Hollywood. Two strong-minded people going in different directions, yet refusing to let go of each other.
With elements of Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris, this absolute feel-good epic is layered and definitely deserves more than one viewing.
Damien Chazelle’s La La LandWoody Allen’s Midnight in Paris
It’s not only romantic, but Mia and Sebastian’s stories are incredibly relatable and real.
Many people were disappointed by the ending (don’t worry, I won’t give it away), as it’s not exactly what was expected, and tinged with sadness. But I thought the ending was absolutely spot-on and perfect, as it keeps the tone of life being a little messy and little disappointing.
Thankfully I was pre-warned about the opening scene, so the overly theatrical and colourful intro did not startle me. But I think everyone must be warned – it only gets better from here.
Nevertheless, this highway traffic jam intertwines with the story throughout the film. A metaphor for being stuck and not sure which direction to go, perhaps. But also the poignant location of the main characters’ first meeting.
This is a refreshing journey, unlike anything I have seen before.
I love the songs, which are few and far between. So claiming you’re ‘not into musicals’ is no excuse to avoid this movie. They sing about meaningful things during meaningful moments, and not about eating cheese or pointless things.
Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling are incredible dancers, singers and musicians – who knew! Gosling actually learnt the piano for the role, with no use for a hand-double.
I love how Stone’s voice isn’t the breathy, stage-sounding voice that you would typically find in American musicals, too. If her voice was too clean or edited, it certainly would have spoilt the soundtrack.
The jazz influence is AH-MAY-ZING. The writer and director is Damien Chazelle who wrote and directed Whiplash (love this movie too). So if you loved how jazz supported that story, you’ll adore the band performances in La La Land.
The trumpets! The pianos! The Sax! Brilliant.
The best part? (Apart from the costume design, music, story, dialogue, pianos and acting) It’s actually funny! I chuckled through my tears of sadness and joy throughout the whole film.
Especially any scene starring the amazing J.K Simmons, who plays Seb’s boss:
Sebastian: I want to let you know you’re looking at a new man. A man who’s happy to be here. [working a pianist at a dingy restaurant] Boss: Right, and you’ll play the set list. Sebastian: Gladly… Although, you know, I thought in this town it worked on a sort of “one for you, one for me” basis type system. How about two for you, one for me? Sebastian: How about all for you and none for me? Boss: That’s perfect, yes. Sebastian: Great. Boss: Okay. Sebastian: Okay, a mutual decision then. Boss: Made by me. Sebastian: Right, and I sign off on it, so… Boss: Whatever. Tell yourself what you want to know.
What a guy!
This movie is full of emotion, and you need to just go with it. Hence why you must lose yourself by watching it in the cinema. It’s a feelings kinda film.
Thank Christ Emma Watson and Miles Teller weren’t the lead actors. Rumour has it they were too demanding and wanted too much money. Youch! And now they are apparently gutted they didn’t snatch the roles.
God. That would have been a disaster… Think what the world would look like today if Hermione played the part of Mia… Think of the La La Land we have come to know, and how easily the movie could have changed… Disaster.
Stone and Gosling were perfect, it wouldn’t have been the same if anyone else had their roles. They’re grounded, humble and elegant. They’re relatable, but also aspirational.
I will see this again. IT’S JUST SO REAL. And beautiful. And true. And honest. With incredibly moving jazz music, which created a movie that is layered, moving and deep.
“Here’s to the ones who dream, foolish as they may seem. Here’s to the hearts that ache, here’s to the mess we make.” – Mia’s audition song
Oh my God I think I might cry again, just thinking about how perfect this movie is. I want a yellow dress and take dance lessons now.
Director: David Yates Writer: J. K. Rowling Released: November 2016 Starring: Eddie Redmayne (The Theory of Everything), Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Ezra Miller (The Perks of Being a Wallflower), Samantha Morton, Jon Voight, Carmen Ejogo, Ron Perlman and Colin Farrell (In Bruges).
—
After 20 minutes of watching this Harry Potter spin-off, I realised it was not going to get any better.
A story of a man (Eddie Redmayne) who was expelled from Hogwarts goes to America to save and conserve magical beasts that have been wrongly accused of being dangerous within the magical community.
Unfortunately, this gets out of hand and his magical beasts escape into New York city and interact with Muggles – or as the Americans call them, No-maj. (Non-magical people.)
I had hyped myself up to see it because I had recently had a Harry Potter movie binge-watch, and had read one of the Potter books. So I thought, to be a real Harry Potter fan, I really ought to see Fantastic Beasts before it ‘disapparated’ from the cinemas.
Unfortunately, it was everything I feared and less:
A desperate clutch at straws to keep Harry Potter cool. Only this time, rather than a down to Earth, scary, gothic English classic, it was drenched in melodrama, and dripping with cringe-worthy, unrealistic American dialogue.
I am aware it was based in New York. But it was too clean, too cheesey, theatrical and lame.
I think it was a business decision to change the tone of the Harry Potter franchise. Perhaps to draw in the American audience. But, as an English Harry Potter film fan, I certainly felt alienated. I don’t enjoy the faff and bright colours of Hollywood in a supernatural movie. The movie just seemed made of plastic. You could tell every scene was filmed on a stage – I kept waiting to see the edge of the cardboard walls when the camera panned.
I thought some of the characters had jumped out of an old Doctor Who episode. (You’ll know what I mean if you’ve seen the David Tennant Doctor Who episode ‘Daleks in Manhattan’.)
Finally: What. the. hell. Why did Johnny Depp make an appearance at the end? Did anyone else get confused by this? Maybe the set design lacked in realism because all the budget was spent on Mr. Depp’s two-second appearance. So ridiculous.
If I hadn’t of spent so much on a cinema ticket, I would have walked out.
Director: Ricky Gervais
Writer: Ricky Gervais
Released: August 2016
Starring: Ricky Gervais
(Unfortunately no guest appearances in this one. Not even Karl Pilkington!)
—
Looking forward to having a big belly laugh, my boyfriend was quick to remind me about his older films. Of which only one – Cemetery Junction – I enjoyed.
He was right, and my initial excitement for David Brent: Life on the Road suddenly took a dive.
Thinking about it, Ricky Gervais has a knack for TV series, but in his film career – in my opinion – he has always been a one-trick-pony.
David Brent is now working in a different office, but takes unpaid holiday to do a local ‘tour’ with his band.
After the first five-minutes of becoming reacquainted with the cocky and cringe-worthy character of David Brent, the repetitive jokes were drilled in over and over. This comedy became boring quite rapidly.
With the amount of static tripod shots used, even the documentary-style quickly slipped away. The interviews with the characters basically told the audience what we already knew about David Brent. We know he’s hopeless and harmless, funny, and ignorant rather than arrogant.
We know how to feel about the character – stop telling us.
The cringe-worthiness became tiring over the one and a half hours. In fact, I ended up giving up on the protagonist rather than being behind him.
I did enjoy some of the lyrics in his songs. A previously unexploited skill of Ricky Gervais’, with a taster of his lyrics shown in the David Bowie episode of Extras.
I missed the banter from the characters in The Office. Instead, the office David Brent works in now were simply split into bullies and heroes, which wasn’t as relatable as in the TV series.
The ‘c-word’ was thrown in for good measure – typical of Gervais films.
If it wasn’t for my boyfriend’s reminder before entering the cinema, I would have been far more disappointed than I was. Instead, this movie has simply reinforced Ricky Gervais’ strengths and weaknesses.
I hope he can team up with Stephen Merchant again to make another super successful TV show. (Like Extras, which I have always found gut-wrenchingly funny.)
David Brent: life on the Road is another typical Gervais film. Not so much aimed toward The Office fans, but more toward Gervais film fans in general. If you love Ghost Town and The Invention of Lying, then you’ll love David Brent: Life on the Road.
Director: Andrew Stanton
Writer: Andrew Stanton
Released: June 2016
Featuring: Ellen DeGeneres, Albert Brooks, Hayden Rolence, Ed O’Neill, Kaitlin Olson, Ty Burrell, Diane Keaton and Eugene Levy
—
I was more keen to see BFG if I’m honest, but mostly because I thought Finding Nemo was so good that ‘Finding Dory‘ was just going to be a cash-in. But due to a particularly over-excited boyfriend, we ended up seeing Finding Dory.
Sharing a small cinema with about 50 people – some of them peculiar, some of them creepy, and only a couple of them under the age of 13 – we unabashedly cracked open a couple of ciders and the movie began. And I was pleasantly surprised.
With new characters and a heart-felt story line, Finding Dory was another genius creation of Pixar.
We follow Dory (Ellen DeGeneres) as she slowly gets flash-backs to her home and parents. It leads her, Nemo (Hayden Rolence) and Marlin (Albert Brooks) across the ocean once again, and finding themselves in a Marine Life Institute. (Featuring Sigourney Weaver as herself).
My favourite character was probably Becky, who is a dotty bird who is rather simple.She is as creepy as she is quirky.
Although I did think Hank (Ed O’Neill (granddad in Modern Family)) the octopus was the most heart-warming character.
But my boyfriend’s favourite character was Bailey (Ty Burrell (aka dad in Modern Family)) the beluga whale due to the humour of watching him figure out how to be a whale, as well as the sounds he made.
Unfortunately, my boyfriend pointed out that the goofy sea lion Gerald has an uncanny resemblance to my good self… I was offended.
In between the genuinely laugh-out-loud moments, the storyline was heavy in parts. The emphasis on family and unity and support and friendship and acceptance and patience… Man! Please calm down on the wholesome messages.
Dory’s short term memory loss became a little irritating, as the ‘wait, what are we talking about?’ jokes began to seem over-used, and wearing thin.
But it’s a movie I would happily see again. I haven’t laughed that loudly in a movie for a long time! It’s certainly aimed at us older kids (in our twenties) who grew up watching Finding Nemo.
Director: Hassan Leo of Elmore films
Writer: Keldamuzik
Released: 2016
Starring: Keldamuzik
—
Judging by the 40-second trailer, Love the Original Way‘s plot was difficult to grasp.
Having consulted the Facebook page, I discovered this was a romantic comedy about a recovering alcoholic woman, Sissy, who turns to online dating.
After a few weird dates with various people, the so-called ‘mentally-unstable’ woman finds out that a man she has been messaging is actually in her drug and alcohol rehab class.
The concept seems a bit dark for a comedy, but online dating aspect is probably quite relatable to a young audience.
I’m suspecting this is a low-budget film – with the echoes in the audio making me wonder if an internal camera microphone was used. Judging by the trailer, there were a few post-production issues too. Resulting in a few premature cuts, and audio drowning out the dialogue. However, the lighting is quite good in the scenes I’ve seen.
I haven’t heard of Keldamuzik before, she plays sissy in Love the Original Way. But she is a recording artist and television personality who has given acting a go, with this project being her first independent film.
It would be interesting to see the entire 15 minutes to judge the storyline and actors, and to see if my suspicions are proved wrong. But for now, it does look like the production issues in this film might distract from the overall concept.
Let me know if you’ve seen Love the Natural Way – perhaps the trailer is just selling it short!
A Little Heart is a short film about a student who finds a disused music room, and rediscovers the old magic of playing an instrument.
I do enjoy the simplicity of this film. One person, one room, no dialogue. Emotion is transferred via the use of lighting, which tells the story of how the character is feeling. The lighting transforms the dingy room into concert hall for the character.
It’s usually the music that carries emotion, however, this wasn’t the case for this short film. Perhaps it was the instrument chosen to transform the character – the marimba. A percussion instrument, that although obviously requires a lot of skill and timing, doesn’t produce the most philosophical or reminiscent sound.
I think the audience would be on the same emotional level as the character if the music supported the story a bit more. But maybe that’s just me! I do like a bit of piano.
Nevertheless, A Little Heartis a well made short film and worth a look.
Director: Kristopher Stoltz
Writer: Kristopher Stoltz
Production company: Non-Human Films
—
Rebirthis a horror web series that follows a group of survivors who are being hunted by a faceless enemy.
The editing is snappy and the lighting is well done in the dimness of the shots. Almost in the style of The Blair Witch Project – or any of the other ‘home movie’ style paranormal horrors of late – the shaky camera work and point of view shots work well in the series.
The creepy sound effects were what really got me on edge, though. The screechy sounds actually made me jump in the first episode.
The actual storyline, however, is a tad ambiguous. Perhaps a shot to set the scene, or a few words before the episode commences would help put the story and characters into perspective.
The voiceover, although helpful, does sound like the beginning of a comedy/drama.. “In a world…”, which doesn’t completely keep you in the zone of a horror.
Despite these little things I would tweek, Rebirth is a short and snappy creepy horror, with great sound effects and editing. The feel of this web series reminds me of Slenderman, a point of view computer game where the player has to avoid a faceless creeper in the woods.
Director: Tim Miller Writer: Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick Released: February 2016 Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Morena Baccarin, Ed Skrein, T. J. Miller, Gina Carano, Brianna Hildebrand and Stefan Kapičić
—
I only had a vague idea of what Deadpool was. I hadn’t seen the trailer, but countless people had recommended the superhero film, saying it was hilarious.
Frankly, you’d have to have a bit of a dark side to you, tough skinned, if you will. A bit of black humour, to have a full-on belly laugh at this film.
The blood, gore and violence reminded me of Watchmen – no one warned me of this… So, consider this a warning to all the girlfriends who have been convinced by their boyfriends that this is a funny film.
It is…
But.
It’s also incredibly gory. For those of you non-comic-book people out there, basically Wade Wilson aka Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) is a sarcastic, normal dude who has got mutated in some creepy underground experimentation lab.
It turns him into a super-human being, but with an incorrigible urge for revenge on those who made him the way he is; scarred and invincible. As well as an insatiable urge to win back his girlfriend, who currently thinks he’s dead.
The main character, Deadpool, is most certainly sarcastic, light-hearted, with a few funny come-backs. I can see why the protagonist’s cockiness can get on some people’s nerves though.
This is mostly due to the film blatantly making fun of itself, breaking fourth walls frequently, and generally not taking itself seriously at all. It is essentially a mock-hero film. Like the film Vampires Suck – a spoof of Twilight. Or, The Starving Games – spoof of the Hunger Games.
Deadpool has been made with a far larger budget, of course. Taking the sarcasm and irony from Iron Manand the violence from Watchmen.
Fun fact: Ryan Reynolds was engaged to singer Alanis Morrisette, then he was married to Scarlett Johansson!
*No one cares*
I would say it’s pretty average over all. But this is a superhero film – which is basically a chick flick for men. As in, if you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
You can’t take it too seriously. It’s funny enough, and for men in their mid-twenties, early-thirties who are comic book, video games know-it-alls, it will be the peanut butter and jam sandwich with chocolate sprinkles of superhero films – you’ll love it.
For the rest of us, however, it was sufficient. Although, potentially irritating and gross.
Crash Testing is a short 4 minute animation showing the life and desires of a crash dummy – the ones companies put into vehicles to see how a body would fare in a car crash.
Not a word of dialogue, which works so well. The sound effects tell the story incredibly well. This is a whole art form in itself, which is so well utilised in this animation.
I’m not a scholar, so I’m probably only grazing the surface with this interpretation of the story.
But I walked away from it thinking how everyone wants to leave their mark behind. Death is inevitable for everyone, but this character still goes ahead bravely and leaves his story behind at every crash. The character does this by painting his face before the crash, leaving a mark on the air bags.
I love the slow motion graphics! I got chills.
Very well done indeed! Quite creepy. Quite moving too, though.
Keep an eye out for when you can see it on their Facebook page.
I enjoyed the concept of the storyline very much – a love triangle between a play director, the actor and the actor’s character. The director falls for the character, but not the actor, and has to think up a clever way to get out of it.
It almost reminds me of Stranger Than Fictionin a way – how someone can be so close to a person when they are a distant idea, only to become discouraged by their flaws and complexities in real life. It’s the difference between the idea of a person, and reality – like meeting a celebrity, I guess.
The acting was pretty good, particularly by Melbourne actress Lore Burns.
I think the story had a great loop, making a parallel of the beginning and ending. It’s well written, incorporating the intimacy of the play within the movie, with the storyline of the film.
I think it would work on a deeper level if the story was layered and extended, as just when you start to figure out the characters, the film comes to a conclusion.
Pretty good over all though. I can see they’ve done well with the resources they had.